Home

Writing to us...

Expressions from you hearts ...

 

1. We welcome your letters
2. Letters that have come to us (new March 2001)
3. Letters that have come to us (new September 2001)

 


Return to top

1.
We welcome letters from you by snail mail, by email,
coming from she mails or he mails.

Marty Kirschen
1613 Raymond Hill Road #2
South Pasadena, CA 91030


Marty


Return to top

2.
Letters that have come to us

1) Looking for children who are willing to go on show regarding bullies
Hello everyone.
As you may already know, we have already filmed the Montel Williams show and are currently waiting to find out when this show on "bullies" will air. I will post this date on my web site as soon as it's known:
http://hometown.aol.com/kthynoll

However, we are now looking for children/teens who are willing to go on
another show. Miguel Sancho of CBS News show 48 Hours contacted me regarding a show on bullies they just started working on. I'm in charge of finding people who are interested and sending him their contact info.

If you are a parent with a child who is a victim, please let me know if you
would be interested in having your information forwarded for possible
inclusion in this show. If you are a teacher with students who are bullied,
and can get permission from their parents for them to take part in this
program, please forward me their contact info. as well.
Thanks so much,
Kathy Noll
Kathy Noll with Dr. Jay Carter
Authors, "Taking the Bully by the Horns"
kthynoll
//////////////////

2) This web page is terrific in its coverage of Emotional Intelligence and School-Family Partnerships
From the Collaboration for the Advancement of Social and Emotional Learning listserv. http://www.casel.org/mail.htm

>From: The George Lucas Educational Foundation <blast>
>Subject: GLEF BLAST Newsletter, February 27, 2001: New Emotional
> Intelligence Content and Redesigned Web Site
>
>New Look: We've been listening to you! The George Lucas Educational
>Foundation (GLEF) has redesigned our web site to provide you with easy
>access to innovative stories of teaching and learning for the Digital Age.
>Site content is organized in 3 major categories: Innovative Classrooms,
>Skillful Educators, and Involved Communities. Check out our new look and
>let us know what you think!
>
>http://www.glef.org
>
>New Content: Emotional Intelligence
>
>"It's clear that parents don't just want SAT-smart kids. They want kids
>who are smart, responsible, non-violent, and caring. We want the whole
>package." - Dr. Maurice Elias, Rutgers University psychology professor
>
>On both national and state levels, policy makers are focusing on school
>accountability based on test scores. If our nation is truly committed to
>improving student achievement, experts such as Dr. Maurice Elias and Dr.
>Daniel Goleman, author of the bestseller "Emotional Intelligence," feel
>we must address the "missing piece" in American education - social and
>emotional learning.
>
>Students need the skills of emotional intelligence to concentrate,
>communicate, work in teams, and cope with the personal and family issues
>that get in the way of learning. Educators have found that such skills
>strengthen students' readiness to learn, connecting their minds and their
>hearts.
>
>Learn more about Emotional Intelligence at:
>
>http://glef.org/eihome.html
///////////////////

3) Hosting and/or tutoring foreign students
Hi, I'm Donald W. Beattie from Winthrop, Maine. I operate an international studies/learning center, here, and have done so for ten years. Summers, I hire about a dozen teachers/tutors to place four students with local families and to teach them American English, through my center and the exchange program, NacelDoor in MN. The morning teaching (field trips are involved, afternoons) stint is for three weeks, weekdays, to a combination of four Spanish and French teenagers from abroad. This is quite interesting work. Many Maine/NE teachers/residents (especially families) have, in the past, placed students in their home and/or taught them or both. One might wish to contact some of the veterans. The two separate sessions are: July and August. One can teach in both sessions or only one.

Perhaps you would know of some young teachers or experienced teachers/persons (they do not have to be certified or English/foreign language teachers) wanting summer work who might wish to contact me concerning my 2001 summer teacher needs. I do a thorough orientation and provide curriculum materials and a substantial stipend plus expenses. Sincerely, Don Beattie, 245A Main Street, Winthrop, Maine 04364. Phone: 377-6251.

PS: I'm also looking for paid, homestay, host families and paid, local representatives ... anywhere in New England and especially in Maine. This is a different program than the American English Tutorial Program (AETP).

Sincerely,
Don Beattie
Nacelod
////////

4) Two new resources of interest to those who are interested in
SEL and academic performance

From the Collaboration for the Advancement of Social and Emotional Learning listserv. http://www.casel.org/mail.htm >

>1/25/01 Vol 21, No. 2 School Board News (National School Board Association)
>"Schools Strive to Align Service Learning into Academic Standards" by Craig
>Colgan. Showcases Pioneer High School in San Jose, CA. and addresses
>Graduation Requirement, Report Cards, Obstacles Remain, National Model,
>Collaboration and Accountability. CNS and Leader Schools mentioned.
>
>2/01 Phi Delta Kappan "Two Special Service-Learning Projects" description
>of two service-learning projects that bolstered both the self-esteem and
>the academic skills of his middle school special education students.
////////////

5) A letter concerning empathy

Dear Marty,
"Here is another thought to run by you. Perhaps I could be really honest and
ask the mailing list a direct question that has been bothering me. I have
found personally that I am in a real dilemma as someone trying to reach out
to colleagues interested in promoting caring. There are some (like you
Marty ) who are as the perfect catalyst genuinely interested in exploring
the topic in depth for understanding and better effectiveness for all of us.

I have personally found though that at conferences or before or after
presentations or in later correspondences when things are not so distracting
when I approach people who are doing talks or workshops on caring and social
emotional learning, etc. that there seems to be little interest in listening
to my take on the issues or how I approach the topic of caring theoretically
or practically. I realize we are all going to be somewhat biased towards
our own ideas but I also believe the whole is larger than the sum of it's
parts and all of us should want to even be better. Why not share our work
and thoughts freely in a noncompetitive way to advance the cause?

This occurred to me a few years ago when I brought in a speaker on
caring and empathy and the parent group afterwards was surprised
in the Q and A that the person really was not listening which they
thought was part of empathy.

In an instinctive protective response I pondered out loud "Are these
speakers fighting against the competition tide and skeptical audiences so
much that they get locked into a defensive or fighting mode to explain our
minority stance even in friendly audiences like this one?" I hope it is not
something more like what Jean Baker Miller and Rachel T. Hare-Mustin said
years ago... That those who get in positions of power have little motivation
to listen. It is only those not in power that appeal to the other's
responsibility to care. When I suggested to the parents that perhaps these
speakers do feel they are fighting against the tide they were not very
sympathetic. To tell you the truth I really felt surprised and disedified
myself.

Has anyone else felt this way? Such is the power I would suggest of our
culture and our socialization but it does not have to be this way. I am
going to carefully watch my own listening after presentations. If we are
talking about these very important topics I do believe we need to walk the
talk if we are going to succeed on our uphill climb. As I write this it
seems another teen in California felt his only way to communicate his needs
or feelings was to kill. We must get our prevention message heard.


Return to top


Caring for Life: Character Education for Partnership Living

Summary for book to be edited by Riane Eisler and Ron Miller It is generally agreed that a major goal of education is to help children grow up to be responsible and productive adults. This is the purpose of what is today called character education. This book is about an essential, though sometimes ignored, component of character education: education for caring relationships rooted in a sense of reverence for life.

Our title, Caring for Life, derives from the proposal made by one of us (Eisler) in Tomorrow’s Children: A Blueprint for Partnership Education in the 21st Century that caring for life – for self, others, and our natural habitat – is integral to an education that helps young people become the best they can be. The other editor (Miller) recently published a collection of his essays under the title Caring for New Life, similarly arguing that a holistic understanding of education begins with a sense of reverence for the creative potential within all persons and in nature as a whole.

The basic premise of Caring for Life is that helping young people learn attitudes and skills for caring relationships is a key to education for a good life and a better society.

The Fourth R
We are all familiar with the basic “three Rs” of reading, writing, and arithmetic. But there is an even more basic R: relationships. From a holistic perspective, everything that exists is interconnected, wholes within wholes; everything is meaningful according to larger contexts. Nothing, and no one, exists in isolation.

If we think about it, we see that the quality of our lives depends upon the quality of our relationships. This is obvious in regard to how we treat our friends, our families, our co-workers, the people in our communities – and how they treat us. It may be less obvious in how we treat the place where we all live – our natural environment – and how it in turn treats us. But this too is a matter of relationships. And it is not a one-way street. Whether our air and water are clean or polluted, whether we are at risk for cancer because of holes in the ozone layer, whether the polar ice caps melt and flood our coastal cities – in short, whether our natural environment nurtures life or harms life—largely depends on how we treat our Mother Earth.

Learning Relational Skills
Schools teach many skills. But only as school violence has become more lethal has more serious attention been given to the basic matter of relational skills – even though we know that caring or cruel behaviors are, like all other behaviors, learned.
Much in our popular culture today teaches young people that uncaring relationships are normal, entertaining, and fun. Consider that in the United States the average child is likely to have watched 8,000 screen murders and more than 100,000 acts of violence by the end of elementary school – and that this figure will again double by the end of his or her teens. Children’s cartoons endlessly show violence as entertaining, manly, and without real consequences. In cops and robbers, spy, and other “adventure” programs, mayhem and murder are the order of the day. All this makes violence seem only natural, even desirable and moral. It models violence, particularly for boys, as the way to solve problems – and the heroic way, at that.

Uncaring, and even abusive, relations are also presented as normal, cool, and entertaining. In situation comedies, put-downs, insults, and even physical injuries such as tripping and falling, are greeted with laugh tracks. In music videos, the humiliation, domination, and brutalization of girls and women are glamorized and romanticized, making it seem as if everyone is having a wonderful time in what are basically dehumanizing relationships.

If we agree that education, particularly character education, needs to cultivate the best human potentials rather than the worst, then clearly schools have a responsibility to counter the messages of popular culture. If we desire to live in a society that values compassion over violence, caring over exploitation, and meaningful relationships over isolation and alienation, then schools have a responsibility to provide young people the best knowledge we have about caring and responsible relations based on the solid body of research we today have about how to best care for ourselves, others, and our Mother Earth.

Relations of Partnership/Respect or Domination/Control
The quality of our relationships, at a personal, community, cultural or ecological level, is conditioned by the degree to which they orient to either a partnership or dominator model of relations. As explained thoroughly in Eisler’s earlier books, the partnership model is a shorthand for describing relations based on mutual respect, sensitivity, trust, and caring. The dominator model describes relations based on insensitivity, mistrust, domination, and ultimately abuse and even violence.

In the dominator model, difference is automatically equated with inferiority or superiority, with controlling or being controlled, with exploitation or being exploited. It is a way of relating in which “superiors” control “inferiors.” This model was much stronger in earlier more authoritarian, top-down times. But it still lingers in many personal and social habits – from the use of force to impose a person’s or a nation’s will to the once hallowed “conquest of nature.” By contrast, in the partnership model, relations are mutually beneficial and differences can be valued, even celebrated, as in the honoring of diversity we hear so much about today. It is the model most of us want – the model we have been moving toward in starts and spurts, against much resistance and periodic regressions, for the last several hundred years. Our subtitle, Character Education for Partnership Living, highlights this distinction.

Partnership-oriented character education is similar in many respects to an emerging educational approach known as “social and emotional literacy.” Both approaches seek to help young people gain more awareness about the difference between appropriate and harmful expressions of feelings and attitudes. Partnership education adds an important dimension—a deeper understanding of the cultural patterns that reinforce “dominator” or “partnership” relationships, and tools for addressing these patterns. Caring for Life aims to give educators and parents specific, relevant ideas for helping our young people develop caring, compassionate, and socially responsible attitudes toward others in their environment.

Ron Miller. milleron

 

Return to top

comments

 

Caring Education Sitemap 0 1 4